a small wooden box

Etymologically, November was originally the ninth month of the year before the Romans messed everything up by adding January and February. But nov- is also the root for “new” in Esperanto, so let’s go with that. Because I’ve got some new stuff coming up.

Although I still don’t have a new release date, A Familiar Problem is moving forward again. I’ve approved the illustration for the cover and, behind the scenes, the wheels and gears are (hopefully) grinding forward.

Once again, I’m planning to do WritingMonth during November. I did this also last year and wrote 23,100 words toward The Ground Never Lies. This year, I’m planning to work on the sequel to A Familiar Problem. I’ve got some notes and a rough outline, so its a project I think I can make some good progress towards. I do have a lot of other obligations, so I don’t know how work I’ll be able to get done, but it’s nice to have a goal.

On November 2nd, I’m scheduled to attend the SFWA Winter Worlds of Giving Kickoff Event. And afterwards, I will probably attend the SFWA Writing Date, which I haven’t been doing as much as I should.

On November 8, I am scheduled to sell books at the Mill District Holiday Arts Market. And the next day, November 9, I am hosting James Cambias for Worldbuilding 101, a face-to-face Straw Dog Writers Guild event at the North Amherst Library Community Room.

On November 15-16, I am attending SFWA Quasar where I will be on a panel on Sunday “Science Fact in Science Fiction: Getting It Right in SFF”. This is the first year that Quasar has been offered, so it’s new for everyone.

Finally, over the weekend of Nov 29-Dec 1, I will attending LOSCon 51 in Los Angeles. I am listed as a participant, but I haven’t yet seen the final schedule. I haven’t attending LOSCon before, so it will totally new for me.

a rock

There is a new scam going round. WriterBeware called it Nigerian Prince Redux and I’ve gotten now a half dozen or more examples. They arrive as emails (or comments on my website, though mostly emails) that present as book clubs that are really excited about one of my books. Or as services to help market my books.

They’re not that hard to recognize. When you look at the emails, they have obvious misspellings in the names. And the people they mention and organizations they refer to don’t exist.

I’ve gotten things like this from when my first book came out. The earlier examples were crude and had all the lure of a bare fishhook. What’s new is the use of AI to create overblown language to try to fish you in. It’s just… Ugh.

The messages use sycophantic language to rave about the book:

I came across Revin’s Heart and was immediately drawn in by its premise, airship pirates, identity, and the courage to follow one’s true self. It’s rare to find a story that blends adventure, steampunk atmosphere, and emotional discovery with such nuance.

Seriously, that blend of steampunk adventure, social tension, and emotional awakening? That’s not writing, that’s alchemy. You didn’t just create a world; you forged one. The war, the class divide, the moral tug-of-war between duty and desire, it’s like you built a literary airship powered by empathy and intellect.

Your novel, with its blend of realistic emotional journey and gentle mystery, appears to be exactly the type of story that resonates deeply with readers who enjoy character-driven fiction with a touch of the speculative. My role is to design and implement a marketing strategy that connects such works with their ideal audience.

They also sometimes rave about me:

And then I look at you, Steven D. Brewer, professor, linguist, environmentalist, IT whisperer, Japanese culture enthusiast , and I realize: of course this story came from your brain. You’ve got the curiosity of a scientist, the soul of a poet, and the mischief of a pirate captain. (I’m convinced you’re secretly running a floating lab over Massachusetts right now.)

They’re just scams, written by AI, and mostly operated by people outside the country, looking to prey on vulnerable people using flattery and deception. But there’s always a small part of you that wishes you could believe all those things.

I’m reminded of the Charlie Brown Halloween special.

Lucy: I got 5 pieces of candy!

Violet: I got a chocolate bar!

Patty: I got a quarter!

Charlie Brown: I got a rock.

If I wanted to have AI rave about me and my books, I could just ask it to do that myself. So, no thank you.

lichens and moss on bark

A local poet I follow on Mastodon posted something about WriteOut which sounded to me like a fun excuse to write some haiku. For many years, I wrote haiku nearly every day. In the past few years, however, I’ve written fewer. But I decided I could write them more often during the three week period.

I’d kinda meant to write one every day, but in the end I only wrote five. Still, it was a lot of fun.

During the period when I was writing haiku most frequently, I decided to publish a chapbook: Poŝtmarkoj el Esperantujo. I enjoyed the experience enough that I made several more. I still use the artwork from my books to supplement the posts here. But, for various reasons, I mostly quit writing haiku and have only written them occasionally over the past several years.

Writing haiku has always been for me, like a moment of zen. I mostly don’t write haiku except from direct experience. Writing them gives me a chance to look at the things around me and just be present in the moment. It was fun to recapture that experience.

I can’t say I’ll start writing more haiku. But maybe. And maybe when #writeout rolls around next year, I’ll do it again.

When I finished my doctorate a national trend had just begun to gradually begin replacing tenure-track faculty with non-tenure-track (NTT) lecturers. In 1996, I applied for several tenure-track positions, but was offered and accepted an NTT appointment as the Director of the Biology Computer Resource Center at UMass Amherst.

At the time, NTT faculty were a tiny fraction of the faculty. They were kind of an oddity and tended to be short-term appointments — often for sabbatical replacement. Every year that followed, however, the proportion increased. And more and more of the NTT faculty were long-term employees. Now about more than 30% of faculty are NTT, they do 75% of the teaching, and they make a bit more than half as much money.

I was on the front-lines of trying to improve the treatment for NTT faculty. (My efforts were recognized earlier this year with a Delphi Award.) When I arrived there were no promotional or professional development opportunities for NTT faculty. Now we have two (and soon to be three) promotional levels and a professional improvement fellowship, which gives NTT faculty a semester of release to work on a significant academic project.

The perception of NTT faculty has also improved. For many years, tenure-system faculty and administrators tended to view NTT faculty as not REAL faculty. They would say things like “Our faculty and lecturers…” as if lecturers were not faculty. Many tenure-system faculty fundamentally believed that to accept an NTT position was to have failed at life.

Over the years, I spent a lot of time thinking about what the actual difference was between tenure-system and NTT faculty. Eventually, I put it like this: Tenure-system faculty are fundamentally investing in themselves, developing an independent national/international reputation in their field, which belongs to them and which is portable. NTT faculty, instead, commit to working to make their host institution as good as it can be.

During the transition from tenure-system to NTT faculty, some units at the university didn’t really get the distinction. In one college, they hired some tenure-system and NTT faculty with identical job descriptions. After several years of wrangling with the union, they offered those faculty the option to go up for tenure. One of my colleagues encouraged me to pursue tenure, but I declined. I had chosen not to invest my effort trying to develop an independent reputation in my field: my goal had been to run my facility and to serve my faculty and students as well as I could. I had no confidence that my faculty would consider that work worthy of tenure.

Now, as I transition to retirement, I have increasingly turned my attention to authorship, publishing short fiction and a number of books. For that, developing an independent national/international reputation is important. The irony that, at the end of my academic life, I’m starting over with what I shunned for my whole professional career is not lost on me. But it’s been fun and interesting to do something new.

key

At WriteAngles, I met a science fiction author who is a newcomer to the Pioneer Valley. He asked if I was aware of any local meetups related to science fiction authorship and if I knew anything about SFWA. Below is my reply, slightly edited.

Unfortunately, I’m not aware of any good, local meetups specifically around science fiction, in spite of the number of authors that are here, with one exception: James Cambias (copied on this message) has an email list by which he occasionally organizes informal get-togethers at local breweries, wineries, or cideries. Perhaps he would add you to the list.

James is also going to be offering a workshop on Worldbuilding for Straw Dog Writers Guild at the North Amherst Library Community Room on November 9: https://strawdogwriters.org/event/worldbuilding-101 This would also be a good opportunity to meet him. And if you know other people who might be interested, please let them know as well.

Note that I also run a writing group, Straw Dog Writes (SDW), that meets online Wednesdays at 7pm via Zoom. We do introductions and chat for 15 minutes then write for 45 minutes, and repeat until 9pm. There are a few of us who are doing science fiction, but we also get poets, essayists, memoirists, etc. Let me know if you’d like to attend and I’ll send you the link.

When I was at Readercon, I spoke with another author in Northampton who expressed interest in trying to organize a speculative fiction meetup for the Pioneer Valley, so I think there’s more interest if we want to try to set something up. We could certainly organize something — perhaps monthly. I could participate if it were online, but probably couldn’t if it was face-to-face, due to my health circumstances. But I’d be happy just to know it was happening and would be happy to help organize/facilitate, if that would be helpful.

Regarding SFWA, the next big thing is Quasar, which is going to be an online event on Nov 15-16. https://membership.sfwa.org/event-6301796 The preliminary program is up and it looks pretty good. SFWA runs a “Writing Date” on Sundays that is just like SDW, except more well attended. (It was what I modeled SDW on.) And there are a number of committees that offer various kinds of ongoing meetups and programming. https://events.sfwa.org/upcoming-events/

The best way to stay current with SFWA is to get added to the Discord server. Email discord@sfwa.org for more info.

As I was writing this, I realized I was rather plugged into what’s going on in the SFF world — It’s like I’m some kind of socialist butterfly. Who would have thought!

I attended the Straw Dog Writers Guild annual conference, Write Angles, as a participant. I had a good time! They had invited me to serve on a science fiction panel. In addition, I attended several other panels during the conference and had the opportunity to meet a lot of people I had only met previously via zoom. Plus, I met even several new people (somewhat unusually for me). Overall, it was an outstanding conference experience.

The opening/keynote speaker was Franny Choi. She primarily asked us to consider what literature is for, especially in the face of the terrible events happening in the world around us: What use is poetry in a time of genocide? It challenged me to think about why I write escapist fluff and gave me a context for several good conversations throughout the day.

The science fiction panel, Writing the Future, was focused on near-term science fiction. I’ve written a few short stories like that, although most of my science fiction is set in some distant future — and I write as much or more fantasy than scifi. The panel was organized and moderated by Mark Schlack and included an outstanding and diverse group of writers: Allegra Hyde, Marisa Williams, and Andrea Hairston. We discussed the challenges of writing near-term science fiction and trying to go beyond dystopian fiction toward writing something more useful and optimistic. There were several interesting and thoughtful questions, including one person who said they had misread the topic and were hoping we were going to discuss the future of science fiction writing. That would be an interesting topic too.

I particularly enjoyed a workshop by Tolley Jones, a columnist for our local paper, on intersectionality. She described a technique she calls “writing from the middle” for moving from a personal experience to an essay that puts the experience in a context that others can understand and appreciate. After an introduction, she had us do a couple of writing exercises and share the results with a peer. Afterwards, she invited us to identify other kinds of identities (e.g. gender, race, class, religion, etc., etc.) and consider how our piece related to people with other identities or backgrounds. And if it wasn’t, why was that? It was a provocative question that got me thinking. She ended with a few concrete suggestions: Tell your story before you conclude anything. Don’t speak about others’ stories without input from that community. Be brave. Tell the truth. Consider your audience, but don’t protect them — don’t minimize your story to make it palatable.

After lunch, I attended a panel with three agents. Up to now, I haven’t tried to query for agents to publish my work and have been working with a small press. For my current work-in-progress, I’ve been planning to start querying to see if I can interest an agent in trying to find a publisher. I took a lot of notes. But was overall a little creeped out by the experience. When I described it to Phil, he immediately said it reminded him of how he discovered that Human Resources is not your friend. Yeah. Exactly. It’s not to say that you shouldn’t have an agent or try to get one. But remember to set boundaries and respect that it’s a business relationship — and primarily a relationship between your book — not you — and the publisher.

I ended up slipping out a little early and didn’t stay for the last session. It was such a beautiful a day, it seemed a shame to spend it all indoors. But I will definitely want to attend again next year.

japanese maple

Fall has begun. It’s always a dark time for me, as the seasons change and the days grow shorter. I have settled into my phased retirement, however, so the semester is not so onerous as it once was. And each thing I do professionally, I have the opportunity to reflect on how it’s the last time — or nearly the last — that I will ever have to do that.

After the wonderful experience with the panel about the evolution of dogs at Worldcon, I decided to have my students research and write about dogs for my scientific writing class. I always try to pick a theme I haven’t chosen before. I have had my students study many things in the 23 years I’ve taught this class — tardigrades, autumn leaves, cockroaches, garlic mustard, frogs, monocots, terrestrial gastropods, leaf miners, earthworms, millipedes, etc. — but I’ve never done dogs before. I think it’s going pretty well.

I’ve been productive with SFF writing as well as fall begins. I finished a novelette, Bearly Believable; wrote a short story, Uplands; and have started working on a second, Tablelands, in the same series. (Both are sequels to Bottomlands, a story that has been accepted for publication, but for which I’ve not yet received a contract.) I wrote about using regular expressions to find other -lands words, so now I have a bunch of ideas for further titles in this series.

I have also written an article for Planetside, the newly renamed SFWA blog. I made a pitch back in August which was accepted. Once I submitted the manuscript, it was sent to a line editor for revisions, which went well. Now it’s with the lead editor for final review and to select some of the images I submitted to go with it. It’s been my first experience writing for Planetside and it’s been a real pleasure.

I’ve not been as diligent about getting work submitted for publication this year. I have two works “in press” though long delayed. But I need to do better at getting work submitted and promptly re-submitted once it’s rejected.

I have two public appearances coming up and anticipate a few more in the coming months. I will appear next month at WriteAngles on a panel about science fiction: Writing the Future. The following month, I am scheduled to be on a panel at SFWA Quasar. I have also applied to be a participant at LOSCon in November, Arisia in January, and the next Worldcon in August.

November is going to be busy. In addition to Quasar and LOSCon, on November 8, I will be selling books at the Mill District Holiday Arts Market and the following day, I will host a Straw Dog Writers Guild craft workshop entitled Worldbuilding 101 with James Cambias.

Around the equinox, I met with the amazing curators of @wss366 to talk about Wandering Shop Stories. It’s a great bunch of folks! We had a new curator join us since our last meeting and it was wonderful to meet her. I love our small community and it gives me immense pleasure every day to have a little creative exercise in the morning to start things off. Our next meeting will be around the solstice.

Although it’s depressing to watch the news, I am encouraged by more than just schadenfreude. Not everything is dark. People are waking up to the fact that AI is a hype and asset bubble. And it looks to me like, in running up against the real world, the Republicans are beginning to realize that actually governing is necessary. I rarely agree with what they’re doing but, occasionally — after exhausting all of the other possibilities — they do finally do the right thing. It’s something.

There’s a long, dark winter ahead. But spring will follow eventually.

I’ve just finished a new manuscript called Uplands. It’s a sequel to a story I wrote about a year ago called Bottomlands. They’re dark fantasy short stories about a witch and her familiar.

I was thinking I might want to write more stories in the series and was grasping for more words that end with -lands. I pretty quickly thought of grasslands and barrowlands, but then I was kind of stumped. I went to do a websearch, but how do you search for -lands?

This is a job for regular expressions, I thought.

I poked around for a few minutes to see if I already didn’t have a dictionary file on my computer, but pretty quickly I decided to just download this list of 479k English words for this purpose. The Internet is still useful for a few things.

Then I crafted my regular expression using the unix utility egrep. I went through a couple of iterations to get it just right, but ended up with this:

egrep '^[a-z].+lands$'  ~/Downloads/words.txt

It looks through the file for words that end in “lands” and that aren’t capitalized (so you don’t get Netherlands, for example).

I ended up with 53 words. I think that’s more stories than I’ll want to write in this series. Some of the words are pretty good too! (e.g. badlands, borderlands, hinterlands all seem good for dark fantasy). Some don’t seem so useful (e.g. islands, lallands, playlands).

Interestingly, barrowlands wasn’t among the words. Go figure.

brain coral

Since the pandemic, the Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers Association (SFWA) has provided a robust online experience for the Nebula conference. It was fully online during 2020 and then resumed in 2022. Since then, there has been a commitment to offering a full (if not always perfectly integrated) online experience during the Nebula Conference. This year, SFWA is trying something new: an online only professional development conference. We’re calling it Quasar.

If you already paid for attendance to either the face-to-face or online Nebula conference, you’re eligible to register for Quasar at no expense. Otherwise, it’s only $50. Register before September 15 to receive the panel participation forms and office-hour surveys.

It will be a weekend of seminars, office hours, and flexible event scheduling with a keynote by the Nebula Grand Master Nicola Griffith.

It should be interesting, informative, and a lot of fun. Anyone interested in writing speculative fiction should strongly consider attending to learn more about the craft and business of writing and to network with your peers. Join us!

widely posted meme contrasting the social media experience one some networks as compared with Mastodon

Today, I shared one of my Mastodon posts with friends, one of whom commented, “Weirdos posting stuff to social media 😂” So I took a few minutes to explain to them why I like Mastodon.

I do like Mastodon. I get more and higher quality engagement with what I share on Mastodon than anyplace else these days. But, more than that, I really just like it. It’s peaceful and relaxing. And a few months ago, I realized why: It reminds me of Usenet.

Usenet was a kind of terminal-based messaging system that scientists and technologists used in the earliest days of the Internet and the before times (i.e. when it was still “NSFNet“). It was an amazingly interesting and useful community of people having high-level discussions of topics both academic and non-academic.

My brother, who was an Unix systems-engineer at the time, had told me about Usenet. Honestly, the main reason I decided to go back to graduate school, was so I could gain access to it. Even at my university, it wasn’t easy. The campus IT group didn’t make it available to the general university community, so I had to request a guest account from the computer science department. As a doctoral student, my request was honored and I used that as my primary computer account, and email address, the whole time I was a graduate student. That was also why I started learning Unix, which became a key factor in landing the job that became my career.

As a student, I used Usenet professionally to further my academic career and research. I had high-level conversations about science education and life science. I used it to recruit subjects for my doctoral research, developing a model of expert performance in phylogenetic tree construction. But that wasn’t all I used it for. I also lived in soc.culture.esperanto, the newsgroup for Esperanto speakers, where I could have conversations with samideanoj from all over the world. This was a genuine novelty at the time, where you otherwise might have to sign up with a penpal service to exchange paper letters with people to have similar contacts. (I did this, in fact, and had interesting correspondence, but it often took many weeks to get responses whereas Usenet allowed you to have conversations in just days — or sometimes even just hours!)

Usenet began to die when AOL came online and there was a constant influx of new non-academic people. People called it “eternal September“. The Usenet community worked for busy academics and professionals because most people respected the conventions. You could use it for high-level discussions because it was high signal and low noise. Once those conventions broke down, the really interesting people mostly abandoned it because it wasn’t worth trying to wade through all of the irrelevant crap that novices tended to post. It was very sad.

Thirty years later, I was surprised to join Mastodon and discover that it reminded me so much of Usenet. It has the same high-quality engagement by interesting, thoughtful people. And it has social conventions that make the environment functional and useful. But then I realized that Mastodon didn’t just remind me of Usenet: It’s literally the same people. There’s Gene Spafford. And Steve Bellovin. And many, many others.

A whole bunch of the old, interesting people I remember from Usenet are here! We are pretty old, too. Most of us are retirement age, if not retired. But it’s been wonderful to reconnect with so many of these folks after so many years.

It’s not just that it has many of the same people, though. It’s the thoughtful design of the software environment. And the social conventions that favor high-quality engagement and reduce both the “copypasta” and the viral “oh, snap!” types of engagement that have come to characterize most social media. It’s always a pleasure to immerse myself in a thoughtful community of people engaged in creative pursuits, whether it’s taking pictures of mosses and lichens or sharing story fragments or responding to prompts about writing pursuits.

It’s not for everyone. But I like it a lot.